Something strange when all become supporters and followers???

   We all know that the members in our House are divided into two parts and each part is working undewr one separate head and are bound to just support and followers and none has the courage to work in the house as per his own conscience, will,wisdom and discretion.  It seems whi8le acfepting nomination,the applicant becomes just supporter and follower and keeps away his own conscience, will,wisdom and discretion.  And this the reason the house does not become house of the people through their representatives.  Here members do not belong to the people who elected them, but they belong to the two people who had nominated their names as candidates.

      And it is beyond calculations that such a large number of people become available to the contesting heads who work under their command only and they actually become dictators.

         We had noted that such a functioning is totally undemocratic.  Here the House passed three Farms Acts with majority, those were notified and at a later stage, when the people did not accept the same, one man withdrew the Acts and were allowed to withdraw with the same majority and during the period inbetween none from the party, none from the members could speak.  This one man show is strange in our democracy.

      We can ask this question not from the two contesting leaders, but we must put this question to the applicant who were candidates and accepted all and none knows how such a large number of people had been sitting in the parliament just sporters and just followers of others when the nation had been paying them and some are getting pension .

        Let us examine this question and all those who had been in the houses must tell us why they had closed their mouths?  Only the app,licants can tell us the truth.

         Advocate  dalip singh wasan,